{"id":21672,"date":"2020-10-17T20:32:00","date_gmt":"2020-10-18T00:32:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/?post_type=case_summary&#038;p=21672"},"modified":"2021-09-15T12:27:11","modified_gmt":"2021-09-15T16:27:11","slug":"lmp-c-ls","status":"publish","type":"case_summary","link":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/lmp-c-ls\/","title":{"rendered":"L.M.P. c. L.S. (2011)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Cette affaire concernait le droit \u00e0 une pension alimentaire pour \u00e9poux.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Le FAEJ, en partenariat avec le R\u00e9seau d&rsquo;action des femmes handicap\u00e9es du Canada (RAFHC) est intervenu devant la Cour supr\u00eame du Court of Canada.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Faits<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>LL.M.P. et L.S. se sont mari\u00e9s en 1988. Peu de temps apr\u00e8s, L.M.P. a re\u00e7u un diagnostic de scl\u00e9rose en plaques. Elle n&rsquo;a plus travaill\u00e9 \u00e0 l&rsquo;ext\u00e9rieur de la maison apr\u00e8s ce moment. Les deux se sont s\u00e9par\u00e9s en 2002 et ont conclu un accord en vertu duquel L.M.P. devait recevoir une pension alimentaire pour \u00e9poux pour une dur\u00e9e ind\u00e9termin\u00e9e. Il n&rsquo;\u00e9tait pas n\u00e9cessaire qu&rsquo;elle cherche un emploi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>En 2007, L.S. a demand\u00e9 \u00e0 un tribunal d&rsquo;\u00e9liminer ultimement ses obligations de pension alimentaire pour \u00e9poux parce que L.M.P. n\u2019\u00e9tait pas devenu autosuffisante. Le juge du proc\u00e8s a conclu que L.M.P. pouvait travailler \u00e0 l\u2019ext\u00e9rieur du domicile et a rendu une ordonnance mettant fin \u00e0 sa pension alimentaire pour \u00e9poux en 2010. La Cour d\u2019appel du Qu\u00e9bec a rejet\u00e9 l\u2019appel de L.M.P. L.M.P. a interjet\u00e9 un appel devant la Cour supr\u00eame du Canada.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Argumentation<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Le FAEJ et le RAFHC ont fait valoir que la fin de la pension alimentaire pour \u00e9poux de L.M.P. repr\u00e9senterait un glissement en arri\u00e8re du droit de la famille vers une approche de la pension alimentaire de \u00ab rupture nette \u00bb. Cela ignorerait le d\u00e9savantage \u00e9conomique subi par les femmes lors des ruptures de relations, r\u00e9sultant de leur r\u00f4le de soignante et des in\u00e9galit\u00e9s syst\u00e9miques sur le march\u00e9 du travail. Cela ignorerait \u00e9galement les contributions des femmes handicap\u00e9es \u00e0 leur famille, ainsi que les besoins particuliers et les obstacles auxquels ces femmes sont confront\u00e9es.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">R\u00e9sultats<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>La Cour supr\u00eame a accueilli l&rsquo;appel de L.M.P. et r\u00e9tabli l&rsquo;ordonnance initiale de pension alimentaire pour \u00e9poux. Il n\u2019y avait pas eu de changement important dans la situation de L.M.P. depuis la conclusion de l\u2019accord, et il n\u2019y avait donc aucune base pour modifier l\u2019ordonnance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Le FAEJ tient \u00e0 remercier Anne-France Goldwater et Robert Leckey, avocats dans cette affaire, ainsi que Nadia Effendi, agente d&rsquo;Ottawa pour le FAEJ et RAFHC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>T\u00e9l\u00e9chargez le factum de FAEJ et RAFHC <a href=\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/L.M.P-SCC.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ici<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lisez la d\u00e9cision de la Cour supr\u00eame du Canada <a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/ca\/scc\/doc\/2011\/2011scc64\/2011scc64.html?autocompleteStr=l.m.p.%20v&amp;autocompletePos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ici<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Nos dossiers sont imparfaits, mais nous faisons de notre mieux pour les mettre \u00e0 jour &#8211; si vous \u00e9tiez impliqu\u00e9 avec le FAEJ dans cette affaire mais que votre nom n&rsquo;appara\u00eet pas ici, veuillez nous envoyer un courriel \u00e0<\/em> <a href=\"mailto:info@leaf.ca\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>info@leaf.ca<\/em><\/a><em>.&nbsp;<\/em>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21672","case_summary","type-case_summary","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>L.M.P. c. L.S. (2011) - LEAF<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/lmp-c-ls\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"L.M.P. c. L.S. (2011) - LEAF\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Cette affaire concernait le droit \u00e0 une pension alimentaire pour \u00e9poux. Le FAEJ, en partenariat avec le R\u00e9seau d&rsquo;action des femmes handicap\u00e9es du Canada (RAFHC) est intervenu devant la Cour supr\u00eame du Court of Canada. Faits LL.M.P. et L.S. se sont mari\u00e9s en 1988. Peu de temps apr\u00e8s, L.M.P. a re\u00e7u un diagnostic de scl\u00e9rose [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/lmp-c-ls\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LEAF\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-09-15T16:27:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/case_summary\\\/lmp-c-ls\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/case_summary\\\/lmp-c-ls\\\/\",\"name\":\"L.M.P. c. L.S. (2011) - LEAF\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-18T00:32:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-09-15T16:27:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/case_summary\\\/lmp-c-ls\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/case_summary\\\/lmp-c-ls\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/case_summary\\\/lmp-c-ls\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R\u00e9sum\u00e9s de d\u00e9cisions\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/case_summary\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"L.M.P. c. L.S. (2011)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"LEAF\",\"description\":\"Women&#039;s Legal Education and Action Fund\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"LEAF\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/09\\\/LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/09\\\/LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb.svg\",\"width\":612,\"height\":110,\"caption\":\"LEAF\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.leaf.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"L.M.P. c. L.S. (2011) - LEAF","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/lmp-c-ls\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"L.M.P. c. L.S. (2011) - LEAF","og_description":"Cette affaire concernait le droit \u00e0 une pension alimentaire pour \u00e9poux. Le FAEJ, en partenariat avec le R\u00e9seau d&rsquo;action des femmes handicap\u00e9es du Canada (RAFHC) est intervenu devant la Cour supr\u00eame du Court of Canada. Faits LL.M.P. et L.S. se sont mari\u00e9s en 1988. Peu de temps apr\u00e8s, L.M.P. a re\u00e7u un diagnostic de scl\u00e9rose [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/lmp-c-ls\/","og_site_name":"LEAF","article_modified_time":"2021-09-15T16:27:11+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/lmp-c-ls\/","url":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/lmp-c-ls\/","name":"L.M.P. c. L.S. (2011) - LEAF","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-10-18T00:32:00+00:00","dateModified":"2021-09-15T16:27:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/lmp-c-ls\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/lmp-c-ls\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/lmp-c-ls\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R\u00e9sum\u00e9s de d\u00e9cisions","item":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"L.M.P. c. L.S. (2011)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/","name":"LEAF","description":"Women&#039;s Legal Education and Action Fund","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#organization","name":"LEAF","url":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb.svg","width":612,"height":110,"caption":"LEAF"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case_summary\/21672","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case_summary"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/case_summary"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}