{"id":22165,"date":"2020-10-07T12:12:30","date_gmt":"2020-10-07T16:12:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/case_summary\/shewchuk-v-ricard-1986-2\/"},"modified":"2021-11-30T12:15:05","modified_gmt":"2021-11-30T17:15:05","slug":"shewchuk-c-ricard-1986","status":"publish","type":"case_summary","link":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/","title":{"rendered":"Shewchuk c. Ricard (1986)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Cette affaire concernait la constitutionnalit\u00e9 de la Child Paternity and Support Act (CPSA) de la Colombie-Britannique, qui permettait uniquement aux m\u00e8res d&rsquo;enfants n\u00e9s hors mariage de demander des ordonnances d&rsquo;affiliation concernant la paternit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;enfant. Ces ordonnances d&rsquo;affiliation pourraient ensuite \u00eatre utilis\u00e9es par les m\u00e8res pour demander des ordonnances de pension alimentaire aux p\u00e8res.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>L\u2019Association du FAEJ West Coast, alors affili\u00e9e \u00e0 le FAEJ, est intervenue devant la Cour d&rsquo;appel de la Colombie-Britannique en partenariat avec:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>British Columbia Association of Social Workers<\/li><li>British Columbia Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA)<\/li><li>Federated Anti-Poverty Groups of B.C.<\/li><li>Vancouver Status of Women.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Faits<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Vicki Louise Shewchuk, qui n&rsquo;\u00e9tait pas mari\u00e9e \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9poque, a donn\u00e9 naissance \u00e0 un fils. Elle a d\u00e9pos\u00e9 une plainte en vertu de la CPSA all\u00e9guant que Jerry Ricard \u00e9tait le p\u00e8re. La paternit\u00e9 de M. Ricard \u00e9tait \u00e9tablie et il \u00e9tait donc tenu de subvenir aux besoins de son fils jusqu&rsquo;au 19e anniversaire de son fils.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>M. Ricard a contest\u00e9 la constitutionnalit\u00e9 de la CPSA. Il a soutenu que cela violait l&rsquo;art. 15 de la Charte, discriminatoire fond\u00e9e sur le sexe parce qu&rsquo;elle n&rsquo;offrait aucun recours aux p\u00e8res cherchant \u00e0 obtenir une pension alimentaire de la part des m\u00e8res d&rsquo;enfants n\u00e9s hors mariage. La Cour provinciale de la Colombie-Britannique a donn\u00e9 raison \u00e0 M. Ricard et a invalid\u00e9 la CPSA. Cependant, la Cour supr\u00eame de la Colombie-Britannique a infirm\u00e9 cette d\u00e9cision et confirm\u00e9 la loi. M. Ricard a interjet\u00e9 appel de cette d\u00e9cision devant la Cour d&rsquo;appel de la Colombie-Britannique.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Argumentation<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>La Coalition des intervenants a soutenu que, bien que la CPSA soit inconstitutionnelle, la r\u00e9paration appropri\u00e9e n&rsquo;\u00e9tait pas d&rsquo;annuler la loi. Cela nuirait aux m\u00e8res qui d\u00e9pendaient des paiements de l&rsquo;ACSP, y compris les m\u00e8res qui recevaient de l&rsquo;aide sociale. Au lieu de cela, la Cour devrait \u00e9tendre la l\u00e9gislation pour qu&rsquo;elle s&rsquo;applique \u00e9galement aux p\u00e8res et aux m\u00e8res.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">R\u00e9sultat<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>La Cour d&rsquo;appel a convenu que la CPSA violait <em>l&rsquo;art. 15 (1) de la Charte<\/em>. Cependant, il a conclu que la restriction des droits \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9galit\u00e9 \u00e9tait justifi\u00e9e en vertu de <em>l&rsquo;art. 1 de la Charte<\/em>. En cons\u00e9quence, la Cour a confirm\u00e9 la CPSA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FAEJ remercie Lynn Smith et David Mossop, avocats dans cette cause.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>T\u00e9l\u00e9chargez le m\u00e9moire <a href=\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Re-Shewchuk-and-Ricard-LEAF-Factum.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ici<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lisez la d\u00e9cision de la Cour d\u2019appel de la Colombie-Britannique <a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/bc\/bcca\/doc\/1986\/1986canlii174\/1986canlii174.html?resultIndex=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ici<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Nos dossiers sont imparfaits, mais nous faisons de notre mieux pour les mettre \u00e0 jour &#8211; si vous \u00e9tiez impliqu\u00e9 avec le FAEJ dans cette affaire mais que votre nom n&rsquo;appara\u00eet pas ici, veuillez nous envoyer un courriel \u00e0<\/em> <a href=\"mailto:info@leaf.ca\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>info@leaf.ca<\/em><\/a><em>.&nbsp;<\/em>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"categories":[],"tags":[584,647,615,609],"class_list":["post-22165","case_summary","type-case_summary","status-publish","hentry","tag-child-support-fr","tag-cpsa-fr","tag-s-15-fr","tag-sex-discrimination-fr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shewchuk c. Ricard (1986) - LEAF<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Cette affaire concernait la constitutionnalit\u00e9 de la Child Paternity and Support Act (CPSA) de la Colombie-Britannique, qui permettait uniquement aux m\u00e8res d&#039;enfants n\u00e9s hors mariage de demander des ordonnances d&#039;affiliation concernant la paternit\u00e9 de l&#039;enfant.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shewchuk c. Ricard (1986) - LEAF\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Cette affaire concernait la constitutionnalit\u00e9 de la Child Paternity and Support Act (CPSA) de la Colombie-Britannique, qui permettait uniquement aux m\u00e8res d&#039;enfants n\u00e9s hors mariage de demander des ordonnances d&#039;affiliation concernant la paternit\u00e9 de l&#039;enfant.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LEAF\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-30T17:15:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/\",\"name\":\"Shewchuk c. Ricard (1986) - LEAF\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-10-07T16:12:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-30T17:15:05+00:00\",\"description\":\"Cette affaire concernait la constitutionnalit\u00e9 de la Child Paternity and Support Act (CPSA) de la Colombie-Britannique, qui permettait uniquement aux m\u00e8res d'enfants n\u00e9s hors mariage de demander des ordonnances d'affiliation concernant la paternit\u00e9 de l'enfant.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R\u00e9sum\u00e9s de d\u00e9cisions\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Shewchuk c. Ricard (1986)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/\",\"name\":\"LEAF\",\"description\":\"Women&#039;s Legal Education and Action Fund\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"LEAF\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb.svg\",\"width\":612,\"height\":110,\"caption\":\"LEAF\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shewchuk c. Ricard (1986) - LEAF","description":"Cette affaire concernait la constitutionnalit\u00e9 de la Child Paternity and Support Act (CPSA) de la Colombie-Britannique, qui permettait uniquement aux m\u00e8res d'enfants n\u00e9s hors mariage de demander des ordonnances d'affiliation concernant la paternit\u00e9 de l'enfant.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shewchuk c. Ricard (1986) - LEAF","og_description":"Cette affaire concernait la constitutionnalit\u00e9 de la Child Paternity and Support Act (CPSA) de la Colombie-Britannique, qui permettait uniquement aux m\u00e8res d'enfants n\u00e9s hors mariage de demander des ordonnances d'affiliation concernant la paternit\u00e9 de l'enfant.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/","og_site_name":"LEAF","article_modified_time":"2021-11-30T17:15:05+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/","url":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/","name":"Shewchuk c. Ricard (1986) - LEAF","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-10-07T16:12:30+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-30T17:15:05+00:00","description":"Cette affaire concernait la constitutionnalit\u00e9 de la Child Paternity and Support Act (CPSA) de la Colombie-Britannique, qui permettait uniquement aux m\u00e8res d'enfants n\u00e9s hors mariage de demander des ordonnances d'affiliation concernant la paternit\u00e9 de l'enfant.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/shewchuk-c-ricard-1986\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R\u00e9sum\u00e9s de d\u00e9cisions","item":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/case_summary\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Shewchuk c. Ricard (1986)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/","name":"LEAF","description":"Women&#039;s Legal Education and Action Fund","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#organization","name":"LEAF","url":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb.svg","width":612,"height":110,"caption":"LEAF"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case_summary\/22165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case_summary"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/case_summary"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.leaf.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}