LEAF logo
LEAF logo
DONATE
MENU
LEAF logo

Contact

DONATE
Informations en français
  • English
  • Français
  • About
    • Our Story
    • Mission & Vision
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Law Program Committee
    • FAQs
    • Employment Opportunities
    • Student Positions
  • Cases and Law Reform
    • Our Work
    • Issue Areas
      • Reproductive Justice
      • Indigenous Rights and Law
      • Identity-Based Oppression
      • Hate Speech and Online Hate
      • Sexual Assault and Consent Law
      • Gender-Based Violence
      • Access to Justice
      • Workplace Rights
      • Socio-Economic Rights
      • Family Law
    • Search Cases & Submissions
    • Current Work
      • Basic Income Project
      • LEAF’s Feminist Strategic Litigation Project
      • LEAF’s Technology-Facilitated Violence (TFV) Project
      • National Abortion Access Framework
      • Reproductive Justice Project
    • Past Projects
    • Legal Resources
  • Education
    • Overview
    • Workshops, trainings & webinars
    • Factsheets & infographics
  • News & Events
    • Search News & Events
    • Events
  • Publications
    • Search Publications
    • Working Papers
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
  • Regional Branches
    • Overview
    • LEAF Edmonton
    • LEAF Halifax
    • LEAF Hamilton
    • LEAF Kingston
    • LEAF Ottawa
    • LEAF Québec
    • LEAF Thunder Bay
    • LEAF Toronto
    • LEAF Windsor
    • LEAF Winnipeg
  • Get Involved
    • Ways to Get Involved
    • Donate
    • Join a Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Become a LEAF Pro Bono Lawyer
    • Partner with LEAF
Menu
  • About
    • Our Story
    • Mission & Vision
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Law Program Committee
    • FAQs
    • Employment Opportunities
    • Student Positions
  • Cases and Law Reform
    • Our Work
    • Issue Areas
      • Reproductive Justice
      • Indigenous Rights and Law
      • Identity-Based Oppression
      • Hate Speech and Online Hate
      • Sexual Assault and Consent Law
      • Gender-Based Violence
      • Access to Justice
      • Workplace Rights
      • Socio-Economic Rights
      • Family Law
    • Search Cases & Submissions
    • Current Work
      • Basic Income Project
      • LEAF’s Feminist Strategic Litigation Project
      • LEAF’s Technology-Facilitated Violence (TFV) Project
      • National Abortion Access Framework
      • Reproductive Justice Project
    • Past Projects
    • Legal Resources
  • Education
    • Overview
    • Workshops, trainings & webinars
    • Factsheets & infographics
  • News & Events
    • Search News & Events
    • Events
  • Publications
    • Search Publications
    • Working Papers
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
  • Regional Branches
    • Overview
    • LEAF Edmonton
    • LEAF Halifax
    • LEAF Hamilton
    • LEAF Kingston
    • LEAF Ottawa
    • LEAF Québec
    • LEAF Thunder Bay
    • LEAF Toronto
    • LEAF Windsor
    • LEAF Winnipeg
  • Get Involved
    • Ways to Get Involved
    • Donate
    • Join a Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Become a LEAF Pro Bono Lawyer
    • Partner with LEAF
Home / Cases and Law Reform / Search Cases & Submissions

Case Summary

R. v. Barton (2017, 2019)

This case concerned the use of racist and sexist stereotypes about Indigenous women in criminal trials, and the meaning of consent in sexual assault law. 

Led by the Institute for the Advancement of Aboriginal Women (IAAW), LEAF and IAAW intervened before the Alberta Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada. 

Facts 

Cindy Gladue bled to death in a hotel room rented by Bradley Barton, from a wound he inflicted upon her. Mr. Barton was charged with first degree murder. He defended himself by arguing that Ms. Gladue had consented to “rough sex”, or at least that he had honestly believed she did. Throughout the trial, Ms. Gladue was dehumanized and her dignity disrespected, including through the introduction into evidence of her preserved pelvis.  

In addition, without having submitted an application under the Criminal Code to present evidence of Ms. Gladue’s prior sexual activity, Mr. Barton testified at length about his previous sexual activity with Ms. Gladue. The Crown did not object, nor did the trial judge order a separate hearing to consider the admissibility and permissible uses of this evidence. At trial, the jury acquitted the accused. The Crown appealed to the Alberta Court of Appeal. The case was then appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada. 

Arguments 

IAAW and LEAF argued that the trial judge should not have admitted evidence of Ms. Gladue’s sexual history into the trial, and that the judge failed to properly instruct the jury on the law of consent. These judicial errors allowed prejudice to infect the trial proceedings, raising discriminatory myths about Indigenous women and consent based on sexual history. In addition, the judge failed to adequately inform the jury that consent to a given form of sexual touching does not extend to the use of any conceivable degree of force by one’s sexual partner. The dehumanization of Ms. Gladue epitomized by this trial is unavoidably connected to the fact that Indigenous women are disproportionately targeted for violence in Canada. 

Outcome 

The Alberta Court of Appeal allowed the Crown’s appeal, and ordered a new trial for Mr. Barton on the charge of first degree murder. The Court determined that the acquittal had resulted from judicial error and discrimination in the trial process.  

Following Mr. Barton’s appeal of the Alberta Court of Appeal’s decision, the Supreme Court of Canada ordered a new trial on manslaughter alone. Three judges would have ordered a new trial on murder.  

The Supreme Court’s decision strongly condemns the use of racist and sexist stereotypes about Indigenous women and encourages trial judges to explicitly counter prejudice against Indigenous women and girls in their instructions to juries. The Court provided clear and conclusive direction on consent – including that there is no defence of implied consent, the accused cannot rely on past sexual history evidence to ground a belief in consent, and that expressed consent to every sexual activity is necessary.  

However, while claiming to uphold the importance of Ms. Gladue’s dignity, the decision failed to go far enough to address the level of dehumanization the trial perpetrated against Indigenous women and to ensure that no Indigenous woman ever has to face such treatment again.  

LEAF is grateful to Lisa Weber, counsel before the Alberta Court of Appeal, as well as to Beverly Jacobs and Shaun O’Brien, counsel before the Supreme Court of Canada.  

LEAF extends a special thank you to the members of the Case Committees, whose expertise and hard work on this difficult and devastating case have had a significant and lasting impact on the law of sexual assault and the courts’ treatment of Indigenous women and girls.  

Download IAAW and LEAF’s Alberta Court of Appeal factum here. 

Download IAAW and LEAF’s Supreme Court of Canada factum here. 

Read the Alberta Court of Appeal’s decision here. 

Read the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision here. 

Our records are imperfect, but we are doing our best to update them – if you were involved with LEAF on this case but your name is not reflected here, please email us at [email protected]. 

Case Documents

May 2, 2016
Alberta Court of Appeal Factum
September 12, 2018
Supreme Court of Canada Factum

Case News

Loading...

May 24, 2019

IAAW and LEAF react to the Supreme Court of Canada judgment in R v Barton

May 22, 2019

IAAW and LEAF continue to seek justice for Cindy Gladue
Help us promote gender equality
Donate to support equality

Search Cases & Submissions

  • Issue Area

  • Type

  • By Date

  • Keyword

  • Reset search
Help us promote gender equality
Donate to support equality

Stay up to date on feminist law and LEAF’s work to advance gender equality



Related Cases

Loading...

R. v. Brown

This case concerned using extreme intoxication as a defence to assault and sexual assault.

A.S. v. H.M.Q.

This case concerns the rights of complainants in sexual assault trials.
More Cases

Related Cases

Loading...

R. v. Brown

This case concerned using extreme intoxication as a defence to assault and sexual assault.

A.S. v. H.M.Q.

This case concerns the rights of complainants in sexual assault trials.
More Cases

Related Issue Area

Loading...

Sexual Assault and Consent Law

Case Summary

R. v. Barton (2017, 2019)

Sidebar Placeholder

LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb_rev
Donate to support equality

National Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1420
Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8
[email protected]
Phone: 416.595.7170
Toll-free: 1.888.824.5323
Facsimile: 416.595.7191

Stay up to date on feminist law and LEAF’s work to advance gender equality



LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb_rev

National Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1420
Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8
[email protected]
Phone: 416.595.7170
Toll-free: 1.888.824.5323
Facsimile: 416.595.7191

Charitable Registration Number: 10821 9916 RR0001

Facebook-f Twitter Instagram

Stay up to date on feminist law and LEAF’s work to advance gender equality



Donate to support equality

© 2020 Women’s Legal Education & Action Fund (LEAF). All rights reserved. | Legal & Privacy | Accessibility | Website by Affinity Bridge

MENU

  • About
    • Our Story
    • Mission & Vision
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Law Program Committee
    • FAQs
    • Employment Opportunities
    • Student Positions
  • Cases and Law Reform
    • Our Work
    • Issue Areas
      • Reproductive Justice
      • Indigenous Rights and Law
      • Identity-Based Oppression
      • Hate Speech and Online Hate
      • Sexual Assault and Consent Law
      • Gender-Based Violence
      • Access to Justice
      • Workplace Rights
      • Socio-Economic Rights
      • Family Law
    • Search Cases & Submissions
    • Current Work
      • Basic Income Project
      • LEAF’s Feminist Strategic Litigation Project
      • LEAF’s Technology-Facilitated Violence (TFV) Project
      • National Abortion Access Framework
      • Reproductive Justice Project
    • Past Projects
    • Legal Resources
  • Education
    • Overview
    • Workshops, trainings & webinars
    • Factsheets & infographics
  • News & Events
    • Search News & Events
    • Events
  • Publications
    • Search Publications
    • Working Papers
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
  • Regional Branches
    • Overview
    • LEAF Edmonton
    • LEAF Halifax
    • LEAF Hamilton
    • LEAF Kingston
    • LEAF Ottawa
    • LEAF Québec
    • LEAF Thunder Bay
    • LEAF Toronto
    • LEAF Windsor
    • LEAF Winnipeg
  • Get Involved
    • Ways to Get Involved
    • Donate
    • Join a Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Become a LEAF Pro Bono Lawyer
    • Partner with LEAF
  • English
  • Français