Skip to content
LEAF logo
LEAF logo
DONATE
DONATE
MENU
LEAF logo

Contact

DONATE
DONATE
Informations en français
  • English
  • Français
  • About
    • Our Story
    • Mission & Vision
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Law Program Committee
    • FAQs
  • Cases and Law Reform
    • Our Work
    • Issue Areas
      • Reproductive Justice
      • Indigenous Rights and Law
      • Identity-Based Oppression
      • Hate Speech and Online Hate
      • Sexual Assault and Consent Law
      • Gender-Based Violence
      • Access to Justice
      • Workplace Rights
      • Socio-Economic Rights
      • Family Law
    • Search Cases & Submissions
    • Current Work
      • Accountability Project
      • Avenues to Justice
      • Strengthening Community Capacity
      • Technology-Facilitated Violence
      • Valuing the Care Economy
    • Past Projects
    • Legal Resources
  • Education
    • Overview
    • Workshops, trainings & webinars
    • Factsheets & infographics
  • News & Events
    • Search News & Events
    • Events
  • Publications
    • Search Publications
    • Working Papers
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
  • Regional Branches
    • Overview
    • LEAF Calgary
    • LEAF Edmonton
    • LEAF Halifax
    • LEAF Hamilton
    • LEAF Kitchener-Waterloo
    • LEAF London
    • LEAF Newfoundland & Labrador
    • LEAF Ottawa
    • LEAF Saskatchewan
    • LEAF Sudbury
    • LEAF Toronto
    • LEAF Windsor
    • LEAF Winnipeg
  • Get Involved
    • Ways to Get Involved
    • Donate to LEAF
    • Join a Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Become a LEAF Pro Bono Lawyer
    • Partner with LEAF
  • About
    • Our Story
    • Mission & Vision
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Law Program Committee
    • FAQs
  • Cases and Law Reform
    • Our Work
    • Issue Areas
      • Reproductive Justice
      • Indigenous Rights and Law
      • Identity-Based Oppression
      • Hate Speech and Online Hate
      • Sexual Assault and Consent Law
      • Gender-Based Violence
      • Access to Justice
      • Workplace Rights
      • Socio-Economic Rights
      • Family Law
    • Search Cases & Submissions
    • Current Work
      • Accountability Project
      • Avenues to Justice
      • Strengthening Community Capacity
      • Technology-Facilitated Violence
      • Valuing the Care Economy
    • Past Projects
    • Legal Resources
  • Education
    • Overview
    • Workshops, trainings & webinars
    • Factsheets & infographics
  • News & Events
    • Search News & Events
    • Events
  • Publications
    • Search Publications
    • Working Papers
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
  • Regional Branches
    • Overview
    • LEAF Calgary
    • LEAF Edmonton
    • LEAF Halifax
    • LEAF Hamilton
    • LEAF Kitchener-Waterloo
    • LEAF London
    • LEAF Newfoundland & Labrador
    • LEAF Ottawa
    • LEAF Saskatchewan
    • LEAF Sudbury
    • LEAF Toronto
    • LEAF Windsor
    • LEAF Winnipeg
  • Get Involved
    • Ways to Get Involved
    • Donate to LEAF
    • Join a Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Become a LEAF Pro Bono Lawyer
    • Partner with LEAF
Home / Cases and Law Reform / Search Cases & Submissions

Case Summary

R. v. Lewis (1996)

This case concerned the constitutionality of “bubble zones” – areas around the homes and offices of doctors who provide abortion services where anti-abortion protest activity is not allowed. 

LEAF intervened before the Supreme Court of British Columbia, in coalition with: 

  • The Elizabeth Bagshaw Society 
  • Everywoman’s Health Centre Society 
  • The B.C. Coalition for Abortion Clinics 
  • The B.C. Women’s C.A.R.E. Program 

Facts 

In 1995, the British Columbia Legislature enacted the Access to Abortion Services Act. This created “bubble zones” around the homes and offices of doctors who provided abortion services in which anti-abortion protest activity was not permitted. The Act created a bubble zone around the Everywoman’s Health Centre in Vancouver.  

Marcus Lewis was charged for protesting and engaging in sidewalk interference in the Centre’s bubble zone. The Provincial Court of British Columbia, however, dismissed the charges because it found the Act violated the right to freedom of conscience and religion, and the right to free expression under the Charter. The Crown appealed to the Supreme Court of British Columbia.  

Arguments 

The Coalition argued that, given the manner in which the Act advanced the constitutional values of equality, privacy and dignity of the person, any violation of Mr. Lewis’ Charter rights was justified under s. 1. The Act only restricted individuals from expressing anti-abortion views in narrowly-defined geographic locations. It focused on ensuring access to healthcare, including abortion services. Anti-abortion activities impaired access by discouraging doctors from providing services, and impaired women’s privacy and health.  

In addition, the Coalition argued that safe, unimpeded and dignified access to lawful abortion services was a necessary component of sex equality in the context of reproduction. The Act therefore promoted sex equality. It also enhanced security of the person under s. 7 of the Charter, by reducing the considerable stress imposed by anti-abortion activities on women requiring abortion services and on service providers. 

Outcome 

The Court found that the Act violated s. 2 of the Charter, but that it was justified under s. 1. The Court noted that health care is fundamental to society, and that women should be able to access health care including abortion services without losing their dignity and/or privacy. The objective of the Act outweighed the infringement of s. 2 of the Charter.  

LEAF’s advocacy in this area did not end with this case. LEAF continued to defend the constitutionality of bubble zone legislation before the courts. For more information, see our intervention in R. v. Demers and R. v. Watson and Spratt. 

LEAF is grateful to Nitya Iyer and Lindsay Lyster, counsel in this case. 

Download the factum here.

Read the British Columbia Supreme Court’s decision here. 

Our records are imperfect, but we are doing our best to update them – if you were involved with LEAF on this case but your name is not reflected here, please email us at [email protected].

Case Documents

May 2, 1996
Supreme Court of British Columbia Factum

Case News

Loading...
Help us promote gender equality
Donate to support equality

Search Cases & Submissions

  • Issue Area

  • Type

  • Submission Type

  • By Date

  • Keyword

  • Reset search
Help us promote gender equality
Donate to support equality

Stay up to date on feminist law and LEAF’s work to advance gender equality



Related Project

Loading...
Woman smiling touching foreheads with a small child
Past Project
Reproductive Justice Project

Related Cases

Loading...

Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. CPSO (2019)

This case concerned access to reproductive health services.

Abortion Access Now PEI v. Government of PEI (2016)

This case concerned access to abortion in Prince Edward Island (PEI).
More Cases

Related Cases

Loading...

Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. CPSO (2019)

This case concerned access to reproductive health services.

Abortion Access Now PEI v. Government of PEI (2016)

This case concerned access to abortion in Prince Edward Island (PEI).
More Cases

Related Issue Area

Loading...

Reproductive Justice

Case Summary

R. v. Lewis (1996)

Sidebar Placeholder

LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb_rev
Donate to support equality

National Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1420
Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8
[email protected]
Phone: 416.595.7170
Toll-free: 1.888.824.5323
Facsimile: 416.595.7191

Linkedin

Stay up to date on feminist law and LEAF’s work to advance gender equality



LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb_rev

National Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1420
Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8
[email protected]
Phone: 416.595.7170
Fax: 416.595.7191

Charitable Registration Number: 10821 9916 RR0001

Facebook-f Twitter Instagram Linkedin

Stay up to date on feminist law and LEAF’s work to advance gender equality



Donate to support equality
Donate to support equality

© 2020 Women’s Legal Education & Action Fund (LEAF). All rights reserved. | Legal & Privacy | Accessibility | Website by Affinity Bridge

MENU

  • About
    • Our Story
    • Mission & Vision
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Law Program Committee
    • FAQs
  • Cases and Law Reform
    • Our Work
    • Issue Areas
      • Reproductive Justice
      • Indigenous Rights and Law
      • Identity-Based Oppression
      • Hate Speech and Online Hate
      • Sexual Assault and Consent Law
      • Gender-Based Violence
      • Access to Justice
      • Workplace Rights
      • Socio-Economic Rights
      • Family Law
    • Search Cases & Submissions
    • Current Work
      • Accountability Project
      • Avenues to Justice
      • Strengthening Community Capacity
      • Technology-Facilitated Violence
      • Valuing the Care Economy
    • Past Projects
    • Legal Resources
  • Education
    • Overview
    • Workshops, trainings & webinars
    • Factsheets & infographics
  • News & Events
    • Search News & Events
    • Events
  • Publications
    • Search Publications
    • Working Papers
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
  • Regional Branches
    • Overview
    • LEAF Calgary
    • LEAF Edmonton
    • LEAF Halifax
    • LEAF Hamilton
    • LEAF Kitchener-Waterloo
    • LEAF London
    • LEAF Newfoundland & Labrador
    • LEAF Ottawa
    • LEAF Saskatchewan
    • LEAF Sudbury
    • LEAF Toronto
    • LEAF Windsor
    • LEAF Winnipeg
  • Get Involved
    • Ways to Get Involved
    • Donate to LEAF
    • Join a Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Become a LEAF Pro Bono Lawyer
    • Partner with LEAF
  • English
  • Français