LEAF logo
LEAF logo
DONATE
MENU
LEAF logo

Contact

DONATE
Informations en français
  • English
  • Français
  • About
    • Our Story
    • Mission & Vision
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Law Program Committee
    • FAQs
    • Employment Opportunities
    • Student Positions
  • Cases and Law Reform
    • Our Work
    • Issue Areas
      • Reproductive Justice
      • Indigenous Rights and Law
      • Identity-Based Oppression
      • Hate Speech and Online Hate
      • Sexual Assault and Consent Law
      • Gender-Based Violence
      • Access to Justice
      • Workplace Rights
      • Socio-Economic Rights
      • Family Law
    • Search Cases & Submissions
    • Current Work
      • Basic Income Project
      • LEAF’s Feminist Strategic Litigation Project
      • LEAF’s Technology-Facilitated Violence (TFV) Project
      • National Abortion Access Framework
      • Reproductive Justice Project
    • Past Projects
    • Legal Resources
  • Education
    • Overview
    • Workshops, trainings & webinars
    • Factsheets & infographics
  • News & Events
    • Search News & Events
    • Events
  • Publications
    • Search Publications
    • Working Papers
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
  • Regional Branches
    • Overview
    • LEAF Edmonton
    • LEAF Halifax
    • LEAF Hamilton
    • LEAF Kingston
    • LEAF Ottawa
    • LEAF Québec
    • LEAF Thunder Bay
    • LEAF Toronto
    • LEAF Windsor
    • LEAF Winnipeg
  • Get Involved
    • Ways to Get Involved
    • Donate
    • Join a Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Become a LEAF Pro Bono Lawyer
    • Partner with LEAF
Menu
  • About
    • Our Story
    • Mission & Vision
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Law Program Committee
    • FAQs
    • Employment Opportunities
    • Student Positions
  • Cases and Law Reform
    • Our Work
    • Issue Areas
      • Reproductive Justice
      • Indigenous Rights and Law
      • Identity-Based Oppression
      • Hate Speech and Online Hate
      • Sexual Assault and Consent Law
      • Gender-Based Violence
      • Access to Justice
      • Workplace Rights
      • Socio-Economic Rights
      • Family Law
    • Search Cases & Submissions
    • Current Work
      • Basic Income Project
      • LEAF’s Feminist Strategic Litigation Project
      • LEAF’s Technology-Facilitated Violence (TFV) Project
      • National Abortion Access Framework
      • Reproductive Justice Project
    • Past Projects
    • Legal Resources
  • Education
    • Overview
    • Workshops, trainings & webinars
    • Factsheets & infographics
  • News & Events
    • Search News & Events
    • Events
  • Publications
    • Search Publications
    • Working Papers
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
  • Regional Branches
    • Overview
    • LEAF Edmonton
    • LEAF Halifax
    • LEAF Hamilton
    • LEAF Kingston
    • LEAF Ottawa
    • LEAF Québec
    • LEAF Thunder Bay
    • LEAF Toronto
    • LEAF Windsor
    • LEAF Winnipeg
  • Get Involved
    • Ways to Get Involved
    • Donate
    • Join a Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Become a LEAF Pro Bono Lawyer
    • Partner with LEAF
Home / Cases and Law Reform / Search Cases & Submissions

Case Summary

Gehl v. Canada (Attorney General) (2017)

This case concerned sex discrimination in the Indian Act, in relation to registration for “Indian status”. 

LEAF intervened before the Ontario Court of Appeal. 

Facts 

Dr. Lynn Gehl is an Algonquin-Anishinaabe woman with more than five continuous generations of Indigenous ancestry. She sought registration as an “Indian” under the registration system in the Indian Act, colloquially referred to as “Indian status”. Under the Indian Act, children with two status Indian parents receive full status, whereas children with only one status Indian parent receive partial status. Those with full status could pass on Indian status to their own children, regardless of the Indian status of the other parent. Those with partial status, however, could pass on status to their children only if the other parent also had either full or partial Indian status. 

Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC, now Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada) denied Dr. Gehl’s registration application. The AANDC Registrar determined that Dr. Gehl did not qualify for Indian status because her grandmother had not identified Dr. Gehl’s grandfather on her child’s birth certificate. Pursuant to AANDC’s Proof of Paternity Policy, if the father was not listed on the birth certificate, he was assumed to be non-Indian. 

Dr. Gehl brought an action for a declaration that the Indian Act violated s. 15(1) of the Charter and for related relief. The action was dismissed and Dr. Gehl appealed to the Ontario Court of Appeal.  

Arguments 

LEAF argued that the registration provisions of the Indian Act, as they were implemented by the Proof of Paternity Policy, created a distinction based on sex and marital status and were discriminatory. The parent who would be disadvantaged by this policy would inevitably be a woman, since it is men rather than women who are unstated on birth certificates. The provisions served to “widen the gap” between Registered Indian women and other members of society and failed to account for the lived realities of Registered Indian women who could not prove the paternity of their children. 

Outcome 

The Ontario Court of Appeal found that the decision to deny Dr. Gehl Indian status was unreasonable, and declared that she was entitled to Indian status. One of the three judges adopted an approach which considered the impact of the policy on the equality rights of Indigenous women, in line with LEAF’s arguments. The other two judges declined to use the Charter, and instead applied administrative law analysis to decide the case.  

LEAF is grateful to Renée Pelletier and Krista Nerland, counsel in this case.

Download the factum here.  

Read the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision here. 

Our records are imperfect, but we are doing our best to update them – if you were involved with LEAF on this case but your name is not reflected here, please email us at [email protected].    

Case Documents

September 23, 2016
Ontario Court of Appeal Factum

Case News

Loading...

Apr 20, 2017

LEAF Welcomes the Decision in Gehl v Attorney General (Canada)

Dec 20, 2016

LEAF Intervenes in Gehl v Attorney General
Help us promote gender equality
Donate to support equality

Search Cases & Submissions

  • Issue Area

  • Type

  • By Date

  • Keyword

  • Reset search
Help us promote gender equality
Donate to support equality

Stay up to date on feminist law and LEAF’s work to advance gender equality



Related Project

Loading...
harry-thaker-wIcwpfuC8Wg-unsplash
Past Project
Legal Strategy Coalition on Violence Against Indigenous Women (LSC)

Related Cases

Loading...

R. v. Sharma (2020, 2022)

This case concerned the over-incarceration of Indigenous women.

Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (A.G.) (2018)

This case concerned sex discrimination in the Indian Act.
More Cases

Related Cases

Loading...

R. v. Sharma (2020, 2022)

This case concerned the over-incarceration of Indigenous women.

Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (A.G.) (2018)

This case concerned sex discrimination in the Indian Act.
More Cases

Related Issue Area

Loading...

Indigenous Rights and Law

Case Summary

Gehl v. Canada (Attorney General) (2017)

Sidebar Placeholder

LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb_rev
Donate to support equality

National Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1420
Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8
[email protected]
Phone: 416.595.7170
Toll-free: 1.888.824.5323
Facsimile: 416.595.7191

Stay up to date on feminist law and LEAF’s work to advance gender equality



LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb_rev

National Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1420
Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8
[email protected]
Phone: 416.595.7170
Toll-free: 1.888.824.5323
Facsimile: 416.595.7191

Charitable Registration Number: 10821 9916 RR0001

Facebook-f Twitter Instagram

Stay up to date on feminist law and LEAF’s work to advance gender equality



Donate to support equality

© 2020 Women’s Legal Education & Action Fund (LEAF). All rights reserved. | Legal & Privacy | Accessibility | Website by Affinity Bridge

MENU

  • About
    • Our Story
    • Mission & Vision
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Law Program Committee
    • FAQs
    • Employment Opportunities
    • Student Positions
  • Cases and Law Reform
    • Our Work
    • Issue Areas
      • Reproductive Justice
      • Indigenous Rights and Law
      • Identity-Based Oppression
      • Hate Speech and Online Hate
      • Sexual Assault and Consent Law
      • Gender-Based Violence
      • Access to Justice
      • Workplace Rights
      • Socio-Economic Rights
      • Family Law
    • Search Cases & Submissions
    • Current Work
      • Basic Income Project
      • LEAF’s Feminist Strategic Litigation Project
      • LEAF’s Technology-Facilitated Violence (TFV) Project
      • National Abortion Access Framework
      • Reproductive Justice Project
    • Past Projects
    • Legal Resources
  • Education
    • Overview
    • Workshops, trainings & webinars
    • Factsheets & infographics
  • News & Events
    • Search News & Events
    • Events
  • Publications
    • Search Publications
    • Working Papers
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
  • Regional Branches
    • Overview
    • LEAF Edmonton
    • LEAF Halifax
    • LEAF Hamilton
    • LEAF Kingston
    • LEAF Ottawa
    • LEAF Québec
    • LEAF Thunder Bay
    • LEAF Toronto
    • LEAF Windsor
    • LEAF Winnipeg
  • Get Involved
    • Ways to Get Involved
    • Donate
    • Join a Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Become a LEAF Pro Bono Lawyer
    • Partner with LEAF
  • English
  • Français