Aller au contenu
LEAF logo
LEAF logo
FAITES UN DON
MENU
LEAF logo

Coordonnées

FAITES UN DON
FAITES UN DON
Informations en français
  • English
  • Français
  • À PROPOS
    • Notre Histoire
    • Mission & Vision
    • Personnel
    • Conseil
    • Comité du programme de droit
    • FAQ
  • CAS ET REFORME DU DROIT
    • Notre travail
    • Domaines d’activité
      • Justice reproductive
      • Les droits des autochtones et la loi
      • Oppression basée sur l’identité
      • Discours de haine et haine enligne
      • La loi sur l’agressions sexuelles et le consentement
      • Violences basées sur le genre
      • Accès à la justice
      • Droits au travaille
      • Les droits socio-économiques
      • Droit de la famille
    • Recherche des cas & soumissions
    • Travail en cours
      • Projet sur la responsibilisation
      • Renforcer la capacité communautaire
      • Valoriser l’économie des soins
      • Violence facilitée par la technologie
      • Des Voies vers la justice
    • Projets antérieurs
      • Justice reproductive
    • Renvois de représentation légale
  • ÉDUCATION
    • Programme d’éducation publique du FAEJ
    • Ateliers, formations et webinaires
    • Fiches d’information et infographiques
  • NOUVELLES ET EVENEMENTS
    • Recherche Nouvelles & Évènements
    • Événements
  • Publications
    • Recherche des publications
    • Documents de travail
    • Rapports
    • Rapports annuels
  • SECTIONS RÉGIONALES
    • Aperçu
    • FAEJ Edmonton
    • FAEJ Halifax
    • FAEJ de Hamilton
    • FAEJ d’Ottawa
    • FAEJ de Toronto
    • FAEJ Windsor
  • IMPLIQUEZ VOUS
    • S’impliquer
    • Joignez vous à une Section
    • Devenez bénévole
    • Devenez un avocat pro bono de la FAEJ
    • Partenariat avec le FAEJ
    • FAITES UN DON AU FAEJ
  • À PROPOS
    • Notre Histoire
    • Mission & Vision
    • Personnel
    • Conseil
    • Comité du programme de droit
    • FAQ
  • CAS ET REFORME DU DROIT
    • Notre travail
    • Domaines d’activité
      • Justice reproductive
      • Les droits des autochtones et la loi
      • Oppression basée sur l’identité
      • Discours de haine et haine enligne
      • La loi sur l’agressions sexuelles et le consentement
      • Violences basées sur le genre
      • Accès à la justice
      • Droits au travaille
      • Les droits socio-économiques
      • Droit de la famille
    • Recherche des cas & soumissions
    • Travail en cours
      • Projet sur la responsibilisation
      • Renforcer la capacité communautaire
      • Valoriser l’économie des soins
      • Violence facilitée par la technologie
      • Des Voies vers la justice
    • Projets antérieurs
      • Justice reproductive
    • Renvois de représentation légale
  • ÉDUCATION
    • Programme d’éducation publique du FAEJ
    • Ateliers, formations et webinaires
    • Fiches d’information et infographiques
  • NOUVELLES ET EVENEMENTS
    • Recherche Nouvelles & Évènements
    • Événements
  • Publications
    • Recherche des publications
    • Documents de travail
    • Rapports
    • Rapports annuels
  • SECTIONS RÉGIONALES
    • Aperçu
    • FAEJ Edmonton
    • FAEJ Halifax
    • FAEJ de Hamilton
    • FAEJ d’Ottawa
    • FAEJ de Toronto
    • FAEJ Windsor
  • IMPLIQUEZ VOUS
    • S’impliquer
    • Joignez vous à une Section
    • Devenez bénévole
    • Devenez un avocat pro bono de la FAEJ
    • Partenariat avec le FAEJ
    • FAITES UN DON AU FAEJ
Home / News & Events / Search News & Events

Case News

LEAF Seeks Leave to Intervene in the Refugee Health Care Appeal

Update:

In an order issued by the Federal Court of Appeal in February, LEAF was denied leave to intervene in this appeal.

The reasons for Justice Stratas’ order are of concern because he gives a narrow interpretation to the test for leave to intervene. In particular, he suggests that an intervenor must have a “direct interest” in the issues on appeal, which is a very challenging standard for a public interest organization to meet.

Contrary to Stratas JA’s reasons, LEAF did not seek to raise a new issue not raised at trial. Rather LEAF sought to emphasize an issue that did not receive sufficient attention at trial: the gendered impacts of the cuts to refugee health care. Our arguments about intersectionality would have provided the Court with important contextual submissions that would assist the Court in rendering a fair decision.

Stratas JA likened LEAF’s intervention on gender grounds to a pharmaceutical company seeking leave to intervene in a patent case simply because it has a patent. This is a troubling comparison given that LEAF carefully chooses the cases in which it seeks leave to intervene and does not do so lightly. LEAF is a non-profit, charitable organization that relies heavily upon pro bono assistance, rather than a multinational, well-resourced industry player. LEAF’s application to intervene, based on its expertise in gender issues, was welcomed by the respondents in the appeal.

Although Stratas JA stated that LEAF’s application was filed late, is should be noted that there is no time limit in the Federal Court of Appeal Rules for filing intervenor motions. LEAF filed within a reasonable time and caused no prejudice to the parties. Indeed, additional intervenor applications were filed not only later than LEAF’s application, but indeed after the February dismissal of LEAF’s application.

LEAF is deeply disappointed that the FCA has chosen not to hear about the gendered impacts of the cuts to refugee health care in this appeal, and will follow the fate of the additional intervenor applications with interest. LEAF will continue to monitor the appeal and is committed to working to protect and promote the equality rights of refugee claimants in Canada.


LEAF has filed a motion for leave to intervene before the Federal Court of Appeal in the Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care et al v Canada case.

In February, 2013, the Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care, the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers, two affected individuals (Daniel Garcia Rodriguez and Hanif Ayubi), and Justice for Children and Youth challenged the legality of federal government health care cuts to refugee claimants before the Federal Court.

In a July 2014 judgment, Justice Anne Mactavish declared the 2012 Orders in Council creating the Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP) to be of no force or effect as of 4 November 2014. In granting the application, Justice Mactavish rejected the Applicants’ administrative law and s. 7 claims, but held that the 2012 changes to the IFHP violate both ss. 12 and 15 of the Charter in a manner that is not saved by s. 1.[1] Concerning the violation of s. 12, the Court found that the “affected individuals are being subjected to ‘treatment’ as contemplated by section 12 of the Charter, and that this treatment is ‘cruel and unusual’. This is particularly, but not exclusively, so as it affects children who have been brought to this country by their parents.”[2] Justice Mactavish found that the “2012 modifications to the IFHP potentially jeopardize the health, and indeed the very lives, of these innocent and vulnerable children in a manner that shocks the conscience and outrages Canadian standards of decency.”[3] She issued a declaration that the Orders in Council that created the 2012 IFHP are inconsistent with ss. 12 and 15 of the Charter and are of no force or effect.

The federal government unsuccessfully sought a stay against Justice Mactavish’s order while it appeals her judgment to the Federal Court of Appeal.

LEAF is seeking leave to intervene in the appeal because there is clearly a gendered impact to the 2012 IFHP cuts. If granted leave, LEAF will argue that refugee women are disproportionately affected by the IFHP cuts because of their gender – for example, the lack of coverage for prenatal and antenatal care severely affects refugee women.  Further, as LEAF argued in Johnstone v CBSA, caregiving of children, family members with disabilities and elders still predominantly falls to women, and refugee women are no different. Thus when a refugee woman is ill and cannot get care, this creates a disproportionate, adverse and LEAF will argue, discriminatory effect upon refugee women.

Women are persecuted worldwide because of their gender. The dangers refugee women and girls face are often related to the gender roles assigned to them and to the lack of gender equality between the sexes. Women often suffer harms which are either unique to their gender, such as female genital mutilation/cutting, forced or early marriage, threats of violence and/or so-called “honour crimes”, dowry-related deaths or forcible abortion, or which are more commonly inflicted upon women than men, such as rape, sexual slavery, forced prostitution, forced or coerced sterilization, and trafficking, domestic violence and the imposition of the death penalty or other physical punishments existing in discriminatory justice systems.  LEAF will argue that gender-related claims to asylum may intersect with other proscribed grounds of discrimination, including age, race, ethnicity/nationality, religion, health, class, caste, as well as being lesbian, bisexual or transgender and other status.

LEAF would offer a unique perspective to the Court given that the parties did not specifically focus upon the effects of the cuts upon women refugee claimants. LEAF would present the Court with an understanding of the situation of women refugees that causes these cuts to be particularly egregious. LEAF would draw upon our almost three decades of Charter litigation experience to assist the Court with its analysis of this critically important program for some of the most marginalized and vulnerable women in Canada.

Since 1985, LEAF has assisted the courts in numerous cases with the interpretation and application of equality rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. LEAF’s mandate has also driven its active involvement in matters of public policy and law, particularly with respect to issues involving human rights and discrimination. Please support LEAF’s work and make your 2014 tax-deductible charitable donation today.

[1] Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care et al v Canada (CIC), 2014 FC 651 online FCC: <http://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/72437/index.do> (CDRC v Canada); at paras 1078-1085

[2] Ibid. at paras 636-637, 690-691, 1080

[3] Ibid. at paras 638-640, 646-661


Since 1985, LEAF has assisted the courts in numerous cases with the interpretation and application of equality rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. LEAF’s mandate has also driven its active involvement in matters of public policy and law, particularly with respect to issues involving human rights and discrimination. Please support LEAF’s work and make your 2014 tax-deductible charitable donation today.

Changeons le droit pour faire respecter l'égalité des genres
Donate
Se joindre!

Related Project

Loading...
A senor patient of African decent, sits across the desk from her female doctor as they go over her recent lab results on a tablet in front of them.  The woman is dressed casually and leaning in closely to look at the screen as the doctor explains what she is seeing.
Travail en cours
Valoriser l’économie des soins  

Related Cases

Loading...

Procureur général du Québec c. Kanyinda

Enter teaser here.

R. v. Kloubakov

This case is about the constitutionality of Criminal Code sex work provisions relating to third parties.
More Cases

Related Issue Area

Loading...

Les droits socio-économiques

LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb_rev
Donate to support equality

National Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1420
Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8
[email protected]
Phone: 416.595.7170
Toll-free: 1.888.824.5323
Facsimile: 416.595.7191

Linkedin

Restez à jour sur le droit féministe et le travail du FAEJ pour faire avancer l'égalité des genres



LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb_rev

National Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1420
Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8
[email protected]
Phone: 416.595.7170
Fax: 416.595.7191

Charitable Registration Number: 10821 9916 RR0001

Facebook-f Twitter Instagram Linkedin

Restez à jour sur le droit féministe et le travail du FAEJ pour faire avancer l'égalité des genres



Donate to support equality
Donate to support equality

© 2020 Women’s Legal Education & Action Fund (LEAF). All rights reserved. | Legal & Privacy | Accessibility | Website by Affinity Bridge

MENU

  • About
    • Our Story
    • Mission & Vision
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Law Program Committee
    • FAQs
  • Cases and Law Reform
    • Our Work
    • Issue Areas
      • Reproductive Justice
      • Indigenous Rights and Law
      • Identity-Based Oppression
      • Hate Speech and Online Hate
      • Sexual Assault and Consent Law
      • Gender-Based Violence
      • Access to Justice
      • Workplace Rights
      • Socio-Economic Rights
      • Family Law
    • Search Cases & Submissions
    • Current Work
      • Accountability Project
      • Avenues to Justice
      • Strengthening Community Capacity
      • Technology-Facilitated Violence
      • Valuing the Care Economy
    • Past Projects
    • Legal Resources
  • Education
    • Overview
    • Workshops, trainings & webinars
    • Factsheets & infographics
  • News & Events
    • Search News & Events
    • Events
  • Publications
    • Search Publications
    • Working Papers
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
  • Regional Branches
    • Overview
    • LEAF Calgary
    • LEAF Edmonton
    • LEAF Halifax
    • LEAF Hamilton
    • LEAF Kitchener-Waterloo
    • LEAF London
    • LEAF Newfoundland & Labrador
    • LEAF Ottawa
    • LEAF Saskatchewan
    • LEAF Sudbury
    • LEAF Toronto
    • LEAF Windsor
    • LEAF Winnipeg
  • Get Involved
    • Ways to Get Involved
    • Donate to LEAF
    • Join a Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Become a LEAF Pro Bono Lawyer
    • Partner with LEAF
  • English
  • Français