Aller au contenu
LEAF logo
LEAF logo
FAITES UN DON
MENU
LEAF logo

Coordonnées

FAITES UN DON
FAITES UN DON
Informations en français
  • English
  • Français
  • À PROPOS
    • Notre Histoire
    • Mission & Vision
    • Personnel
    • Conseil
    • Comité du programme de droit
    • FAQ
  • CAS ET REFORME DU DROIT
    • Notre travail
    • Domaines d’activité
      • Justice reproductive
      • Les droits des autochtones et la loi
      • Oppression basée sur l’identité
      • Discours de haine et haine enligne
      • La loi sur l’agressions sexuelles et le consentement
      • Violences basées sur le genre
      • Accès à la justice
      • Droits au travaille
      • Les droits socio-économiques
      • Droit de la famille
    • Recherche des cas & soumissions
    • Travail en cours
      • Projet sur la responsibilisation
      • Renforcer la capacité communautaire
      • Valoriser l’économie des soins
      • Violence facilitée par la technologie
      • Des Voies vers la justice
    • Projets antérieurs
      • Justice reproductive
    • Renvois de représentation légale
  • ÉDUCATION
    • Programme d’éducation publique du FAEJ
    • Ateliers, formations et webinaires
    • Fiches d’information et infographiques
  • NOUVELLES ET EVENEMENTS
    • Recherche Nouvelles & Évènements
    • Événements
  • Publications
    • Recherche des publications
    • Documents de travail
    • Rapports
    • Rapports annuels
  • SECTIONS RÉGIONALES
    • Aperçu
    • FAEJ Edmonton
    • FAEJ Halifax
    • FAEJ de Hamilton
    • FAEJ d’Ottawa
    • FAEJ de Toronto
    • FAEJ Windsor
  • IMPLIQUEZ VOUS
    • S’impliquer
    • Joignez vous à une Section
    • Devenez bénévole
    • Devenez un avocat pro bono de la FAEJ
    • Partenariat avec le FAEJ
    • FAITES UN DON AU FAEJ
  • À PROPOS
    • Notre Histoire
    • Mission & Vision
    • Personnel
    • Conseil
    • Comité du programme de droit
    • FAQ
  • CAS ET REFORME DU DROIT
    • Notre travail
    • Domaines d’activité
      • Justice reproductive
      • Les droits des autochtones et la loi
      • Oppression basée sur l’identité
      • Discours de haine et haine enligne
      • La loi sur l’agressions sexuelles et le consentement
      • Violences basées sur le genre
      • Accès à la justice
      • Droits au travaille
      • Les droits socio-économiques
      • Droit de la famille
    • Recherche des cas & soumissions
    • Travail en cours
      • Projet sur la responsibilisation
      • Renforcer la capacité communautaire
      • Valoriser l’économie des soins
      • Violence facilitée par la technologie
      • Des Voies vers la justice
    • Projets antérieurs
      • Justice reproductive
    • Renvois de représentation légale
  • ÉDUCATION
    • Programme d’éducation publique du FAEJ
    • Ateliers, formations et webinaires
    • Fiches d’information et infographiques
  • NOUVELLES ET EVENEMENTS
    • Recherche Nouvelles & Évènements
    • Événements
  • Publications
    • Recherche des publications
    • Documents de travail
    • Rapports
    • Rapports annuels
  • SECTIONS RÉGIONALES
    • Aperçu
    • FAEJ Edmonton
    • FAEJ Halifax
    • FAEJ de Hamilton
    • FAEJ d’Ottawa
    • FAEJ de Toronto
    • FAEJ Windsor
  • IMPLIQUEZ VOUS
    • S’impliquer
    • Joignez vous à une Section
    • Devenez bénévole
    • Devenez un avocat pro bono de la FAEJ
    • Partenariat avec le FAEJ
    • FAITES UN DON AU FAEJ
Home / News & Events / Search News & Events

Case News

Supreme Court rules that where consent is conditioned on condom use, a condom must be worn

Read the R. v. Kirkpatrick full case summary

July 29, 2022 –  Today’s Supreme Court of Canada decision makes clear the need to respect a person’s decision to engage in sexual activity only with a condom, says the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF).  

In its decision in R. v. Kirkpatrick, a majority of the Supreme Court clarified that when a person consents to sex on the condition that their partner wear a condom, but the partner does not comply, the sexual activity in question is not consensual and constitutes sexual assault. LEAF intervened in this case to argue that this approach to consent in the context of condom use promotes substantive equality for equity-deserving groups, including women, girls, trans, and non-binary individuals.  

“This decision is an important statement that sexual partners must respect a decision to insist on condom use during sex,” says Pam Hrick, LEAF’s Executive Director & General Counsel. “This is foundational to the right to sexual autonomy and equality.” 

The majority of the Supreme Court recognized that sex with a condom is a “fundamentally and qualitatively different physical act” than sex without a condom. It made clear that when someone says “no, not without a condom”, Canada’s consent law says this actually means “no” and cannot be reinterpreted as “yes, without a condom.” This means that when a survivor comes forward with a report of non-consensual condom refusal or removal, there is no need to additionally prove that the accused deceived the survivor.  

LEAF is also pleased that the majority recognized non-consensual condom refusal and removal as a form of sexual violence that disproportionately impacts women and gender-diverse people. The Court cited LEAF’s submission that “[t]his is even more true for racialized members of these communities.” Power dynamics in relationships can impact the ability of members of marginalized communities to assert condom use during sexual activity.  

“The Court has recognized that failing to use a condom where one has been requested and required is not uncommon,” says Hrick. “This phenomenon, which includes the practice of ‘stealthing’, is particularly associated with intimate partner violence and disproportionately impacts marginalized communities, including sex workers.” 

As LEAF welcomes today’s decision, it will also continue its advocacy to end harmful myths and stereotypes about sexual violence survivors – including victim blaming – so that survivors can feel secure and supported in coming forward with their accounts.  

Frances Mahon and Kirat Khosa represented LEAF as an intervener before the Supreme Court in this case, with the assistance of Elsa Kaka.  

LEAF is grateful to the members of the case committee that guided, informed, and supported this intervention: Andrea Krüsi (Centre for Gender and Sexual Health Equity), Joshua Sealy-Harrington (Lincoln Alexander School of Law), and Adriel Weaver (Goldblatt Partners).  

Media Contacts  

Pam Hrick 
Executive Director & General Counsel  
416-627-9024 

Rosel Kim 
Staff Lawyer 
647-926-2416 
[email protected] 

Read the full case summary
Changeons le droit pour faire respecter l'égalité des genres
Donate
Se joindre!

Related Project

Loading...
Rear back view of a mother and daughter embrace sitting on bed at home, older sister consoling younger teen, girl suffers from unrequited love share secrets trustworthy person relative people concept
Travail en cours
Des voies vers la justice 

Related Cases

Loading...

Sa Majesté le Roi c. Edwin Tsang

Enter teaser here.

R. v. Brown

This case concerned using extreme intoxication as a defence to assault and sexual assault.
More Cases

Related Issue Area

Loading...

La loi sur l’agressions sexuelles et le consentement

LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb_rev
Donate to support equality

National Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1420
Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8
[email protected]
Phone: 416.595.7170
Toll-free: 1.888.824.5323
Facsimile: 416.595.7191

Linkedin

Restez à jour sur le droit féministe et le travail du FAEJ pour faire avancer l'égalité des genres



LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb_rev

National Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1420
Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8
[email protected]
Phone: 416.595.7170
Fax: 416.595.7191

Charitable Registration Number: 10821 9916 RR0001

Facebook-f Twitter Instagram Linkedin

Restez à jour sur le droit féministe et le travail du FAEJ pour faire avancer l'égalité des genres



Donate to support equality
Donate to support equality

© 2020 Women’s Legal Education & Action Fund (LEAF). All rights reserved. | Legal & Privacy | Accessibility | Website by Affinity Bridge

MENU

  • About
    • Our Story
    • Mission & Vision
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Law Program Committee
    • FAQs
  • Cases and Law Reform
    • Our Work
    • Issue Areas
      • Reproductive Justice
      • Indigenous Rights and Law
      • Identity-Based Oppression
      • Hate Speech and Online Hate
      • Sexual Assault and Consent Law
      • Gender-Based Violence
      • Access to Justice
      • Workplace Rights
      • Socio-Economic Rights
      • Family Law
    • Search Cases & Submissions
    • Current Work
      • Accountability Project
      • Avenues to Justice
      • Strengthening Community Capacity
      • Technology-Facilitated Violence
      • Valuing the Care Economy
    • Past Projects
    • Legal Resources
  • Education
    • Overview
    • Workshops, trainings & webinars
    • Factsheets & infographics
  • News & Events
    • Search News & Events
    • Events
  • Publications
    • Search Publications
    • Working Papers
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
  • Regional Branches
    • Overview
    • LEAF Calgary
    • LEAF Edmonton
    • LEAF Halifax
    • LEAF Hamilton
    • LEAF Kitchener-Waterloo
    • LEAF London
    • LEAF Newfoundland & Labrador
    • LEAF Ottawa
    • LEAF Saskatchewan
    • LEAF Sudbury
    • LEAF Toronto
    • LEAF Windsor
    • LEAF Winnipeg
  • Get Involved
    • Ways to Get Involved
    • Donate to LEAF
    • Join a Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Become a LEAF Pro Bono Lawyer
    • Partner with LEAF
  • English
  • Français