Aller au contenu
LEAF logo
LEAF logo
FAITES UN DON
MENU
LEAF logo

Coordonnées

FAITES UN DON
FAITES UN DON
Informations en français
  • English
  • Français
  • À PROPOS
    • Notre Histoire
    • Mission & Vision
    • Personnel
    • Conseil
    • Comité du programme de droit
    • FAQ
  • CAS ET REFORME DU DROIT
    • Notre travail
    • Domaines d’activité
      • Justice reproductive
      • Les droits des autochtones et la loi
      • Oppression basée sur l’identité
      • Discours de haine et haine enligne
      • La loi sur l’agressions sexuelles et le consentement
      • Violences basées sur le genre
      • Accès à la justice
      • Droits au travaille
      • Les droits socio-économiques
      • Droit de la famille
    • Recherche des cas & soumissions
    • Travail en cours
      • Projet sur la responsibilisation
      • Renforcer la capacité communautaire
      • Valoriser l’économie des soins
      • Violence facilitée par la technologie
      • Des Voies vers la justice
    • Projets antérieurs
      • Justice reproductive
    • Renvois de représentation légale
  • ÉDUCATION
    • Programme d’éducation publique du FAEJ
    • Ateliers, formations et webinaires
    • Fiches d’information et infographiques
  • NOUVELLES ET EVENEMENTS
    • Recherche Nouvelles & Évènements
    • Événements
  • Publications
    • Recherche des publications
    • Documents de travail
    • Rapports
    • Rapports annuels
  • SECTIONS RÉGIONALES
    • Aperçu
    • FAEJ Edmonton
    • FAEJ Halifax
    • FAEJ de Hamilton
    • FAEJ d’Ottawa
    • FAEJ de Toronto
    • FAEJ Windsor
  • IMPLIQUEZ VOUS
    • S’impliquer
    • Joignez vous à une Section
    • Devenez bénévole
    • Devenez un avocat pro bono de la FAEJ
    • Partenariat avec le FAEJ
    • FAITES UN DON AU FAEJ
  • À PROPOS
    • Notre Histoire
    • Mission & Vision
    • Personnel
    • Conseil
    • Comité du programme de droit
    • FAQ
  • CAS ET REFORME DU DROIT
    • Notre travail
    • Domaines d’activité
      • Justice reproductive
      • Les droits des autochtones et la loi
      • Oppression basée sur l’identité
      • Discours de haine et haine enligne
      • La loi sur l’agressions sexuelles et le consentement
      • Violences basées sur le genre
      • Accès à la justice
      • Droits au travaille
      • Les droits socio-économiques
      • Droit de la famille
    • Recherche des cas & soumissions
    • Travail en cours
      • Projet sur la responsibilisation
      • Renforcer la capacité communautaire
      • Valoriser l’économie des soins
      • Violence facilitée par la technologie
      • Des Voies vers la justice
    • Projets antérieurs
      • Justice reproductive
    • Renvois de représentation légale
  • ÉDUCATION
    • Programme d’éducation publique du FAEJ
    • Ateliers, formations et webinaires
    • Fiches d’information et infographiques
  • NOUVELLES ET EVENEMENTS
    • Recherche Nouvelles & Évènements
    • Événements
  • Publications
    • Recherche des publications
    • Documents de travail
    • Rapports
    • Rapports annuels
  • SECTIONS RÉGIONALES
    • Aperçu
    • FAEJ Edmonton
    • FAEJ Halifax
    • FAEJ de Hamilton
    • FAEJ d’Ottawa
    • FAEJ de Toronto
    • FAEJ Windsor
  • IMPLIQUEZ VOUS
    • S’impliquer
    • Joignez vous à une Section
    • Devenez bénévole
    • Devenez un avocat pro bono de la FAEJ
    • Partenariat avec le FAEJ
    • FAITES UN DON AU FAEJ
Home / News & Events / Search News & Events

Case News

Release: Supreme Court to hear appeal in sexual assault case that could impede access to justice for complainants labelled with intellectual disabilities

Read the R. v. Slatter (2020) full case summary

For immediate release – November 5, 2020 

Tomorrow, on November 6th, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear arguments in a sexual assault case from Ontario that has significant access to justice implications for complainants in sexual assault trials who are labelled with intellectual disabilities. The coalition consisting of LEAF, DisAbled Women’s Network Canada (DAWN), and ARCH Disability Law Centre (ARCH) are intervening in the appeal to highlight how substantive equality requires the court to assess a complainant’s reliability based on her own conduct and capacity on the stand, as opposed to generalizations and stereotypes about her disability.  

This case is about a woman labelled with an intellectual disability who disclosed sexual assault. At trial, defence counsel argued the complainant was unreliable, because her intellectual disability made her suggestible – meaning that she was easily influenced by suggestions made by others. The trial judge did not accept these submissions, and convicted the accused of sexually assaulting the complainant. 

The accused appealed to the Court of Appeal and argued, in part, that the judge did not provide sufficient reasons explaining why he found the complainant reliable. The majority of the Court of Appeal for Ontario overturned the conviction and ordered a new trial, finding that the judge’s reasons were not sufficient. The majority focused on the expert report from the trial that discussed the complainant’s suggestibility in relation to that of the general population, and held that the trial judge failed to adequately address the issue of the complainant’s reliability and suggestibility in his reasons. 

LEAF-DAWN-ARCH will argue that a substantive equality analysis requires the Court to make assessments of reliability based on the actual abilities and individual circumstances of women with disabilities (such as their ability to describe what happened). By preferring the expert’s generalized evidence over the complainant’s testimony, the majority’s approach could require trial judges in future cases to assess the suggestibility of any complainant labelled with an intellectual disability regardless of their actual capacity. This would effectively create a different and heightened standard for complainants labelled with intellectual disabilities, even when there is no evidence of a complainant being suggestible during their interaction with law enforcement when they report, or at trial. 

« Substantive equality demands that complainants in the criminal justice system have their evidence evaluated based on their testimony – and not based on stereotypes, generalizations, or even unconscious biases about those labelled with intellectual disabilities, » says Megan Stephens, Executive Director and General Counsel of LEAF.  

« I am highly troubled by the systemic ableism in the justice system that acts as a barrier to complainants with disabilities having their evidence assessed on the same standard as others,” says Bonnie Brayton, Executive Director of DAWN. “While the Supreme Court’s decision in D.A.I. [in 2012] sent a welcome message to women with disabilities that they can tell their stories in court about the abuse they experience, this decision suggests that they will face additional hurdles when they do so. » 

“Ableist generalizations about women labelled with intellectual disabilities create additional barriers to justice; women must overcome those generalizations in order to be found to be reliable witnesses. Consequently, women with disabilities may be more reluctant to report sexual assault for fear that their testimony will not be believed or that medical and sensitive information about their disability will become public. This case presents an important opportunity to guard against harmful stereotypes and promote equal access to justice for sexual assault complainants labelled with intellectual disabilities,” says Robert Lattanzio, Executive Director of ARCH Disability Law Centre.  

The hearing at the Supreme Court will take place on November 6th at 9:30am EST, which can be viewed by live webcast here.  

Case committee and Counsel 

LEAF-DAWN-ARCH’s arguments were informed and supported by a case committee composed of academics and practitioners with expertise in the relevant issues. The committee members for this intervention are (in alphabetical order): Shelley Fletcher (People First of Canada), Karine-Myrgianie Jean-François (DAWN), Barb McIntyre (Boost Child & Youth Advocacy Centre), Janet Mosher (Osgoode Hall Law School), Roxanne Mykitiuk (Osgoode Hall Law School), and Tess Sheldon (Faculty of Law, University of Windsor).  

The LEAF staff who contributed to the case were Megan Stephens, Rosel Kim, and Nicole Biros-Bolton. 

For background and judicial history of the case, see our earlier announcements when LEAF-DAWN-ARCH submitted its written submissions to the Supreme Court of Canada. 

-30- 

For media inquiries, contact: 

Suzan E. Fraser 
Fraser Advocacy 
T : 416 703 9555 
E : [email protected] 

Kerri Joffe, Staff Lawyer 
ARCH Disability Law Centre 
E: [email protected] 

Rosel Kim, Staff Lawyer 
Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund 
E: [email protected] 

About Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF) 

The Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF) works to advance the substantive equality rights of women and girls through litigation, law reform, and public education. Since 1985, LEAF has intervened in landmark cases that have advanced equality in Canada—helping to prevent violence, eliminate discrimination in the workplace, provide better maternity benefits, ensure a right to pay equity, and allow access to reproductive freedoms. 

To support our work to protect the equality rights of women and girls, please consider donating today. 

About DisAbled Women’s Network Canada (DAWN) 

Established in 1985, DAWN is a national, feminist, cross-disability organization that has provided opportunities for self-determination and leadership development for women and girls with disabilities for 35 years. DAWN’s mission is to end the poverty, isolation, discrimination and violence experienced by Canadian women with disabilities and Deaf women. DAWN works towards the advancement and inclusion of women and girls with disabilities and Deaf women and girls by creating change at a systemic level. DAWN has intervened before the Supreme Court of Canada on its own, or in coalition with LEAF, in numerous criminal and human rights-related cases. 

About ARCH Disability Law Centre (ARCH) 

ARCH is a specialty legal clinic, with a 40-year history of defending and advancing the equality rights and inclusion of persons with disabilities. ARCH is governed by a community-based board of directors, the majority of whom are persons with disabilities. ARCH provides legal advice directly to persons with disabilities in Ontario, conducts test case litigation before all levels of courts and tribunals, and maintains an extensive law reform practice. ARCH has particular expertise in human rights law, equality rights law and access to justice for persons with disabilities. 

Read the full case summary
Changeons le droit pour faire respecter l'égalité des genres
Donate
Se joindre!

Related Project

Loading...
Rear back view of a mother and daughter embrace sitting on bed at home, older sister consoling younger teen, girl suffers from unrequited love share secrets trustworthy person relative people concept
Travail en cours
Des voies vers la justice 

Related Cases

Loading...

Ahluwalia c. Ahluwalia

Enter teaser here.

Saskatchewan (Minister of Education) v. UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity (Court of Appeal) 

This case is about what courts can and can’t say about a law once the NWS clause has been invoked.
More Cases

Related Issue Area

Loading...

Accès à la justice

LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb_rev
Donate to support equality

National Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1420
Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8
[email protected]
Phone: 416.595.7170
Toll-free: 1.888.824.5323
Facsimile: 416.595.7191

Linkedin

Restez à jour sur le droit féministe et le travail du FAEJ pour faire avancer l'égalité des genres



LEAF_FAEJ_hz_names_colour_rgb_rev

National Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1420
Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8
[email protected]
Phone: 416.595.7170
Fax: 416.595.7191

Charitable Registration Number: 10821 9916 RR0001

Facebook-f Twitter Instagram Linkedin

Restez à jour sur le droit féministe et le travail du FAEJ pour faire avancer l'égalité des genres



Donate to support equality
Donate to support equality

© 2020 Women’s Legal Education & Action Fund (LEAF). All rights reserved. | Legal & Privacy | Accessibility | Website by Affinity Bridge

MENU

  • About
    • Our Story
    • Mission & Vision
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Law Program Committee
    • FAQs
  • Cases and Law Reform
    • Our Work
    • Issue Areas
      • Reproductive Justice
      • Indigenous Rights and Law
      • Identity-Based Oppression
      • Hate Speech and Online Hate
      • Sexual Assault and Consent Law
      • Gender-Based Violence
      • Access to Justice
      • Workplace Rights
      • Socio-Economic Rights
      • Family Law
    • Search Cases & Submissions
    • Current Work
      • Accountability Project
      • Avenues to Justice
      • Strengthening Community Capacity
      • Technology-Facilitated Violence
      • Valuing the Care Economy
    • Past Projects
    • Legal Resources
  • Education
    • Overview
    • Workshops, trainings & webinars
    • Factsheets & infographics
  • News & Events
    • Search News & Events
    • Events
  • Publications
    • Search Publications
    • Working Papers
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
  • Regional Branches
    • Overview
    • LEAF Calgary
    • LEAF Edmonton
    • LEAF Halifax
    • LEAF Hamilton
    • LEAF Kitchener-Waterloo
    • LEAF London
    • LEAF Newfoundland & Labrador
    • LEAF Ottawa
    • LEAF Saskatchewan
    • LEAF Sudbury
    • LEAF Toronto
    • LEAF Windsor
    • LEAF Winnipeg
  • Get Involved
    • Ways to Get Involved
    • Donate to LEAF
    • Join a Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Become a LEAF Pro Bono Lawyer
    • Partner with LEAF
  • English
  • Français